The Microsoft Antitrust Case Essay -- essays research papers fc

The case against Microsoft was brought buy the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several state Attorneys General. Microsoft is accused of using and maintaining monopoly office to gain an unfair advantage in the market. The case has been under observation for a long time, nevertheless the Justice department is having trouble coming up with substantial evidence against Microsoft. Specifically, the Department must(prenominal) proveThat Microsoft has monopoly power and is using it to gain unfair leverage in the market.And that Microsoft has maintained this monopoly power through "exclusionary" or "predatory" acts(Rule).Some maintain that Microsoft is only taking advantage of its position in the market and using innovative marketing strategies to attract new customers. They have elect to implement a market development strategy to attract new customers who are looking for a system that has internet capability. Microsoft feels that by integrating their Internet Ex plorer web browser technology into Windows, they are only improving its overall functionality available to the customer. Microsoft began expanding into the browser area because of increasing threat from Netscape and Java. Java is the programme language used to make Netscape. Programs that are written in Java can work on any PC, whether it has Windows on it or not. That is why in that location is a great threat to the Windows environment. The much Netscape is used, the more other vendors will begin writing Netscape compliant programs and the more Java will be used, which puts a damper on Windows. So Windows introduced their Internet explorer to combat the increasing Netscape usage. It did not do this to create a monopoly, but to protect itself. If people construct that Java programs can be run on ANY PC, then they will realize that they do not need to buy Windows. Some say that Microsoft began its "illegal" agenda when it began requiring PC manufacturers to sign a license agreement that said that if they were going to have Windows preinstalled on their new systems, that the Windows Internet Explorer must also be installed. Although it is possible for consumers to install other browsers onto Windows and use them, critics say that Microsoft still has an unfair advantage. It also keeps other browser companies from being able to weigh with PC manufacturers to put their browser on the PC from the beginn... ...nies, server companies, and just about any other company that has something to do with a computer. Microsoft knows that it has the dominant operating(a) system on the market right now and every software company, ISP, etc, wants to be part of it. If they are not, then they are likely to go under. The more and more companies that join Microsoft, the more and more Microsofts monopoly power will grow. Pretty soon, Microsoft will own 100% of the market not only in browsers, but I believe in many other areas, such as software production and distribution and even what kind of computer, its hardware, etc, that can run Windows. I do not believe that Microsofts monopoly agenda solely contains their "browser war", but that it extends to a much higher scale. Works CitedWeb Sites<a href="http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/microsoft.htm field of study Resources">http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/microsoft.htmCase Resources<a href="http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/sherman.txt">http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/sherman.txt<a href="http//www.cnn.com/US/9805/18/federal.complaint/">http//www.cnn.com/US/9805/18/federal.complaint/